This is absolutely a fascinating documentary. Watch this now if you think you know everything (anything?) about HIV.
"Because its been surrounded by Day 1 with so much emotion so much fear so much psychology so much drama, very few people can look at AIDS logically."
I feel like few people feel they know much about what AIDS is, but they are aware of the energy of deep fear that surrounds it. Is it possible this is some type of control tactic? How honest has our scientific community and government been about telling us all we need to know? Before I say more... I could not say it better than what is written on some of the articles online. And you really need to see this documentary.
There was a time when I imagined medical research as an idealized endeavor, carried out by scientists interested only in truth. Up close, it turns out to be much like any other human enterprise, riven with envy, ambition and the standard jockeying for position. Labs and universities depend on grants, and grantmaking is fickle, subject to the vagaries of politics and intellectual fashion, and prone to favor scientists whose work grips the popular imagination. Every disease has champions who gather the data and proclaim the threat it poses. The cancer fighters will tell you that their crisis is deepening, and more research money is urgently needed. Those doing battle with malaria make similar pronouncements, as do those working on TB, and so on, and so on. If all their claims are added together, you wind up with a theoretical global death toll that "exceeds the number of humans who die annually by two- to threefold," said Christopher Murray, a World Health Organization director.
Rian Malan in his article AIDS in Africa In Search of the Truth (Rolling Stone 2001)
“We can be exposed to HIV many times without being chronically infected. Our immune system will get rid of the virus within a few weeks, if you have a good immune system.”Dr. Luc Montagnier, 2008 Nobel Prize winner for discovering HIV
My education in the complexities of the ELISA test started when I came across an article in a scientific journal published last year. It told a story that began in 1994, when researchers ran HIV tests on 184 high-risk subjects in a South African mining camp. Twenty-one of the subjects came up positive or borderline positive on at least one ELISA. But the results were confusing: A locally manufactured test indicated seven, but different people in almost every case. A French test declared fourteen were infected.It seemed something was confounding the tests, and the prime suspect was plasmodium falciparum, one of the parasites that causes malaria: Of the twenty-one subjects who tested positive, sixteen had had recent malaria infections and huge levels of antibody in their veins. The researchers tried an experiment: They formulated a preparation that absorbed the malaria antibodies, treated the blood samples with it, then retested them. Eighty percent of the suspected HIV infections vanished.
Rian Malan in his article AIDS in Africa In Search of the Truth (Rolling Stone 2001)
There is strong evidence that the HIV test you took is very often wrong. We have found over fifty different scientific studies listing seventy non-HIV conditions that can make the test produce false positive results. Depending on which test you took, they have been proven to be wrong as much as 90% of the time, and could be wrong 100% of the time. So you might not be HIV-positive at all.
In Africa, HIV status is irrelevant. Even if you test negative, you can be called an AIDS patient:From a study in Ghana: “Our attention is now focused on the considerably large number (59%) of the seronegative (HIV-negative) group who were clinically diagnosed as having AIDS. All the patients had three major signs: weight loss, prolonged diarrhea, and chronic fever.” (Lancet. October,1992)
Knowing is Beautiful: the Hidden Face of HIV by Liam Scheff
Start questioning. Why have we assumed this all to be true? Maybe it's not even remotely true. The video even says there is no evidence to say its sexually linked. It's an excellent documentary and poses a lot of questions that demand answering before we make the assumptions we are already making. Watch this!